Zsigmondy’s Theorem for Chebyshev Polynomials

1 Introduction

Among all polynomial sequences, the following two seem to be most distinguished: the sequence of the power maps \(x^{n}\) and the sequence of the Chebyshev polynomials \(T_{n}(x)\), defined either by the property \(T_{n}(\cos (\theta ))=\cos (n\theta )\), or recursively \(T_{0}(x)=1\), \(T_{1}(x)=x\), \(T_{n+2}(x)=2xT_{n+1}(x)-T_{n}(x)\).

Their best known mutual property is probably the composition identity, which we state here for the Chebyshev polynomials:

\[ T_{n}(T_{m}(x))=T_{m}(T_{n}(x))=T_{mn}(x). \]

In this paper we investigate such property – namely, we prove the Chebyshev polynomials analogue of Zsigmondy’s Theorem.

Zsigmondy’s Theorem says for which natural numbers \(a,n{\gt}1\) there is a prime divisor \(p\) of \(a^{n}-1\) that does not divide any of the numbers \(a^{d}-1\), \(d{\lt}n\) (such primes are called primitive prime divisors) or, equivalently, there is a prime number \(p\) such that the multiplicative order \({\mathrm{ord }}_{p}(a)\) equals \(n\).

The above mentioned link between the power maps and the Chebyshev polynomials evoke the question whether we could replace \(a^{n}\) in Zsigmondy’s Theorem by \(T_{n}(a)\). Our answer is Theorem 1; in order to formulate it we have to introduce the following Chebyshevian analogue of the multiplicative order. For an integer \(a\) and a prime number \(p\) denote 1

\[ \text{Che}_{p}(a)=\min \left\lbrace m\in {\mathbb {Z}}_{{\gt}0}\, \colon \, T_{m}(a) \equiv 1 \mod p \right\rbrace ; \]

this quantity always exists by Lemma 3.

Theorem 1
#

Let \(n\) and \(a\) be integers such that \(n{\gt}0\). There exists a prime number \(p\) such that \(n=\text{Che}_{p}(a)\), except in the following cases:

  • \(a=1\) and \(n{\gt}1\),

  • \(a=0\) and \(n\notin \left\lbrace 2,4\right\rbrace \),

  • \(a=-1\) and \(n{\gt}2\),

  • \(n=1\) and \(a\in \left\lbrace 0,2 \right\rbrace \),

  • \(n=2\) and \(a=\pm 2^{\alpha -1}-1\),

  • \(n=3\) and \(a=\tfrac {1}{2}(\pm 3^{\alpha }-1)\),

  • \(n=4\) and \(a=\pm 2^{\alpha -1}\),

  • \(n=6\) and \(a=\tfrac {1}{2}(\pm 3^{\alpha }+1)\),

where \(\alpha \) runs through positive integers.

  1. Since most Latin and Greek characters are already used in number theory notation, we find the choice of Cyrillic character \(\text{Che}\) (the lowercase of the letter Che) to be appropriate.