Adversarial checks and common objections#

“The determinant is \(-2\), not \(1\)#

The standard hypothesis is any nonzero constant. In any case, the normalized map has determinant exactly \(1\), integer coefficients, and identity linear part.

“A nonzero Jacobian only gives local injectivity”#

Correct—and the conjecture claimed that this local condition, for a polynomial self-map of affine space, forced global polynomial invertibility. The explicit collision disproves precisely that claim.

“The map is nonproper, so it is not a counterexample”#

Properness is not a hypothesis of the Jacobian conjecture. Adding it would make the global conclusion much easier. The escape at infinity explains how the valid Keller map fails globally; see Discriminant and behavior at infinity.

“The three substitutions may miss a zero of the determinant”#

The determinant was computed as a polynomial identity, not sampled at the three points. The hand proof works on a dense open set and then uses polynomial identity, while three CAS implementations independently expand it.

“Perhaps the three points are equal in disguise”#

Their \(x\)-coordinates are \(0,1,-1\), so they are distinct over characteristic zero. The fiber Gröbner basis proves they are exactly the three reduced points over the target.

“Ax–Grothendieck or simple connectedness forbids this”#

Ax–Grothendieck says an injective polynomial self-map is surjective; this map is not injective. Simple connectedness rules out nontrivial finite étale covers; this map is étale but nonproper and therefore not finite. Its image even omits an explicit curve.

“Known degree-three or prime-degree theorems forbid it”#

The coordinate degrees are \((7,6,4)\). Cubic-homogeneous reductions raise dimension, and the recent prime field-extension result often mentioned in this context is explicitly two-dimensional. Neither applies to this map.

“A preprint already proved the conjecture”#

The user-supplied arXiv:2209.01451 is an unrefereed claimed proof, not accepted literature. Its conclusion is contradicted by these exact identities. The history of this problem contains many withdrawn or corrected proof claims; see the literature audit.